Question: Your own personal Joe Shlabotnik

Click to view larger

My sister clipped this comic from the newspaper and gave it to me. I think we all can relate to Charlie Brown here. I know I can.

Ironically, it was my sister who always got the one card I wanted-needed-had-to-have when we were kids. Whoever was my personal “Joe Shlabotnik” at the time. Looking back is a bit fuzzy, but I remember two occurrences of this phenomenon: 

#1 – 1989-90 Topps Pittsburgh Penguin sticker

In my freshman year of high school, I bought a box of 1989-90 Topps (36 packs), got the complete 198-card set but was 1 sticker shy of completing the 33-sticker set.

My sister bought 4 packs and got the one sticker I was missing: #16 – Pittsburgh Penguins. 

I probably traded 20 or so various 1980s Penguins cards for this logo sticker. Negotiation was not my strong suit when I was a kid. Fortunately, I was in honors algebra that year, because 2 years later…

#2 – 1991-92 Upper Deck Eric Lindros Canada Cup

Bad luck struck again in fall of 1991. Now a Junior in high school, I bought 2 boxes (72 packs) of 1991-92 Upper Deck hockey cards. The one card I did not get was this short-printed card of Eric Lindros, which had a high Beckett value of $15 at the time. 

My sister bought one pack and got this card. I am not exaggerating.

Both my sister and I were in honors math classes, but I’m 2 years older. I saved all my honors Algebra homework from my freshmen year, and ended up trading a semester’s worth for this card.  I got to complete my set, and my sister got all the answers. 

My sister and I talked during the Sharks-Canucks game last night. She could not remember any specific times when she got a card that I needed–she just remembered that this was a regular occurrence when we were kids.

Question: What card was your “Joe Shlabotnik” when you were young? Did you have to overpay–or trade too much–to get it?

Question: Do you collect graded cards?

Some guy with no wife or girlfriend spent $94,000 on this card.

Graded cards are the pissing match of collecting.

Think about it. Suppose I have a Wayne Gretzky rookie card–not graded like the one above, which sold for $94,000 earlier this month–but a nice, ungraded one. Or maybe I pulled it from a pack 30 years ago and kept it safely tucked away.

Then you get a Gretzky rookie.  Continue reading “Question: Do you collect graded cards?”

2011 Playoffs – Round 3 Predictions

The Final Four of Hockey. No Blackhawks. No Penguins. No Capitals. And those pesky Canucks are still around.

The number 1 seed versus the number 2 seed. It’s actually refreshing to see the top two teams in the conference finals.

Series: Vancouver Canucks (1) vs. San Jose Sharks (2).

My Prediction: Sharks UPSET in 6 games.

Comments: If you haven’t guessed by now, I really don’t want the Canucks to win. Because let’s face it: if a Canadian team won the Stanley Cup, every man, woman and child in the United States would forget that hockey ever existed. The consequences are dire.

Besides, the Sharks are long overdue for a trip to the Stanley Cup Finals.

Fancy seeing you here, Bruins and Lightning.

Series: Boston Bruins (3) vs. Tampa Bay Lightning (5).

My Prediction: Bruins win in 5 games.

Comments: Like the Sharks, the Bruins seem long overdue for a shot at The Cup, too.

And you know what would be the most awesomest thing ever? A Sharks-Bruins Stanley Cup Final where Joe Thornton is named the series MVP.

2011 Playoffs – Round 2 Recap

Ouch! I didn’t do too well in my predictions for Round 2…

Things played out pretty much as expected in the Western Conference.

Series: Vancouver Canucks (1) vs. Nashville Predators (5)

My Prediction: Predators UPSET in 6 games.

What Actually Happened: Canucks won in 6 game.

Comments: I really wanted to see the Canucks get stomped on. Unfortunately, the Predators were not the team to do it. Well, there’s always the next round.

Series: San Jose Sharks (2) vs. Detroit Red Wings (3)

My Prediction: Sharks win in 6 games.

What Actually Happened: Sharks won in 7 games.

Comments: This was a fun series. Best of all, I was in a sports bar for game 7, and people were cheering for the Sharks–not because of former ‘Hawk Antti Niemi, but because no one in Chicago wants to see Detroit win. Ever.

Upsets du jour in the Eastern Conference.

Series: Washington Capitals (1) vs. Tampa Bay Lightning (5).

My Prediction: Capitals win in 4 games.

What Actually Happened: Lighting UPSET in 4 games.

Comments: Wow. Can I get a WTF? please? I guess Lightning coach Guy Boucher is due for a raise at the end of the season…and that Capitals coach Bruce Bodreau is due for his walking papers. But seriously, Caps…WTF?

Series: Philadelphia Flyers (2) vs. Boston Bruins (3).

My Prediction: Flyers in 7 games.

What Actually Happened: Bruins UPSET in 4 games.

Comments: I think we all kind of half-suspect the Capitals to sabotage themselves sooner or later. But the Flyers? They were a much improved squad over last year’s team that made it to the Finals. I was actually expecting them to make it to the Finals again this year…not roll over and die.

——————–
OK, that didn’t go as I expected, so I guess I’ll stick to my day job. On to the next round.

2011 Playoffs – Round 2 Predictions

Yes, I know. Round 2 has already started. What’s up with that, NHL? Maybe some of us teach class on Thursday nights.

Anyway, here are my predictions–solely done for my own amusement (and most likely not yours).

Will we see another upset? I sure hope so.

Series: Vancouver Canucks (1) vs. Nashville Predators (5)

My Prediction: Predators UPSET in 6 games. .

Comments: Sure the Canucks beat the Blackhawks. No one likes losing, but it is sometimes perceived that it is OK to lose to the eventual winner.

I disagree. I want to see the Canucks get stomped on.

Series: San Jose Sharks (2) vs. Detroit Red Wings (3)

My Prediction: Sharks win in 6 games.

Comments: It is against my mortal being to cheer for the Red Wings. Besides, the Sharks really are long overdue for a trip to the Stanley Cup Finals.Go Sharkies!

I don’t predict an upset here in the East–the top seeds are just too good.

Series: Washington Capitals (1) vs. Tampa Bay Lightning (5).

My Prediction: Capitals win in 4 games.

Comments: Winning in 7 games against the Crosby-and-Malkin-less-Penguins is not that admirable of a feat. I doubt that the Lightning (I refuse to call them the “Bolts”) will fare well against the Capitals. Besides, the Caps are long overdue to finally amount to something in the playoffs.

Series: Philadelphia Flyers (2) vs. Boston Bruins (3).

My Prediction: Flyers in 7 games.

Comments: Both of these teams needed 7 games to knock off their lower-seeded opponents in the first round. I think they’ll need 7 games to sort this one out too. Let’s hope for a good, physical (but clean) series.

——————–
In summary, the Final Four I’d like to see are:

  • San Jose Sharks – my prediction for Cup winner this year
  • Nashville Predators – because they are unexpected as contenders
  • Washington Capitals – long overdue for a shot
  • Philadelphia Flyers – prove that last year wasn’t a fluke

I’ll admit, it’s a bit hard to focus on the playoffs now that the ‘Hawks are eliminated. So I guess I’ll start cheering for the Sharks.

2011 Playoffs – Round 1 Recap

Well, not everything turned out as expected. But that is the beauty of the first round.

Here are my predictions again, and the actual results. :

Considering how tight the Western Conference standings were, you’d think there would have been a few upsets, right?

Series: Vancouver Canucks (1) vs. Chicago Blackhawks (8)

My Prediction: Blackhawks win in 6 games.

What Actually Happened: Canucks won in 7 games.

Comments: Call me an idealist, but I really though the ‘Hawks could pull off an upset. And they almost did. But almost doesn’t count in hockey. At least the Blackhawks gave us a series.

So far, 0 for 1.

Series: San Jose Sharks (2) vs. Los Angeles Kings (7)

My Prediction: Sharks win in 5 games.

What Actually Happened: Sharks won in 6 games.

Comments: We all knew that the Kings wouldn’t go far without Anze Kopitar. Hah…that rhymed. Imagine what they could have done if that kid was in the lineup.

This puts me at 1 for 2 now.

Series: Detroit Red Wings (3) vs. Phoenix Coytoes

My Prediction: Red Wings win in 7 games.

What Actually Happened: Red Wings SWEEP in 4 games.

Comments: Sure, we knew the Wings would win. But I’m disappointed in Ilya Bryzgalov. I thought the Coytoes goaltender would steal at least ONE game in the series.

Now, I’m 2 for 3. Moving on…

Series: Anaheim Mighty Ducks (4)  vs. Nashville Predators (5)


My Prediction: Ducks win in 5 games.

What Actually Happened: Nashville won in 6 games.

Comments:  Well, here’s our Western Conference upset. Mad props to the Predators for winning their first playoff series in franchise history.

2 for 4 now. 50%.

Over in the East, things were a lot closer. At least in 3 of the series.

Series: Washington Capitals (1) vs. New York Rangers (8)

My Prediction: Captials sweep in 4.

What Actually Happened: Washington won in 5 games.

Comments: I think we all knew the Caps would power their way to Round 2.

3 for 5.

Series: Philadelphia Flyers (2) vs. Buffalo Sabres (7)

My Prediction: Flyers win in 6 games.

What Actually Happened: Flyers won in 7 games.

Comments: Tomas Vanek–the highest-paid Buffalo Sabre–was ineffectual in this series (just like he was in my fantasy hockey pool). Flyers have improved since their Stanley Cup run from last year, so I’m not surprised by the outcome.

4 for 6.

Series: Boston Bruins (3) vs. Montreal Canadiens (6)

My Prediction: Bruins win in 6 games.

What Actually Happened: Boston won in 7 games.

Comments: Wow! Another Game 7. This series was tight, but it’s good to see the Bs get to the next round. Though I’m not a big follower of the Eastern Conference, I’ll always pull for Tim Thomas.

5 for 7.

Series: Pittsburgh Penguins (4) vs. Tampa Bay Lightning (5) 

My Prediction: Penguins win in 7.

What Actually Happened: Lightning win in 7.

Comments: No Crosby and no Malkin make Penguins go something something…

A shame we won’t get a Caps-Pens matchup in Round 2.

That puts me at 5 for 8.

—————————————-
OK, let’s see if I can get my Round 2 predictions up before Round 2 is over…

2011 Playoffs – Round 1 Predictions

It’s the most wonderful time of the year!

Everyone enjoys the playoffs, but I really love Round 1. There are 3 or 4 games a night and they all mean something. 

Plus, there’s always at least one first round upset.

So, without further ado, here are my somewhat biased and totally unscientific Round 1 playoff predictions:

Things got really tight in the Western Conference, especially at the end. A mere 2 points separated the 4th seed from the 8th seed(there were 3 teams with 99 points, 1 with 98 and 1 with 97). If anything, this shows how evenly-matched many of these teams are.

Series: Vancouver Canucks (1) vs. Chicago Blackhawks (8)

My Prediction: Blackhawks win in 6 games.

Comments: Even though I am a Chicago Blackhawks fan, I have no delusions about them repeating as Stanley Cup Champions this season. Eighth place teams just don’t do that.

But at the same time, if we can count on one thing, it is that the best team in the league usually chokes sooner or later (the Sharks last year, the Capitals 2 years ago).

This is going to be the first-round upset in the Western Conference.

Series: San Jose Sharks (2) vs. Los Angeles Kings (7)

My Prediction: Sharks win in 5 games.

Comments: The Kings have had a decent year, but the Sharks are a better team. Plus, the Kings lost Anze Kopitar–their best player. Even with Kopitar in the lineup, there’s no guarantee that the Kings would win. But with him gone, they won’t stand a chance against the Sharks.

Series: Detroit Red Wings (3) vs. Phoenix Coytoes

My Prediction: Red Wings win in 7 games.

Comments: The Red Wings are too good to not make it to the second round. But the Coyotes–led by goalie Ilya Bryzgalov–have had a breakout year. The way Bryzgalov has played, I could see him single-handedly winning the series for the ‘Yotes. Win or lose, he will still make things miserable for Detroit.

Series: Anaheim Mighty Ducks (4)  vs. Nashville Predators (5)


My Prediction: Ducks win in 5 games.

Comments: The Ducks would sweep the Predators if they had Jonas Hiller in net. But Hiller is still suffering from (all things) vertigo. Yes, the Preds have a darn good defensive corps, led by Shea Weber and Ryan Suter. But the Ducks have Huey, Duey and Luey….or make that Ryan, Corey and Bobby. And that Teemu guy ain’t too bad either, even at 40.

I usually don’t pay much attention to The East unless there’s a Pens-Flyers series. Maybe in Round 2. But first, Round 1. So…

Series: Washington Capitals (1) vs. New York Rangers (8)

My Prediction: Captials sweep in 4.

Comments: Ovechtrick! Ovechtrick! Ovechtrick!

Yeah, Alexander Ovechkin has been hot and cold this season, but either way the Capitals are good enough to sweep New York. And the Rangers are bad enough to be the team that gets swept.

Series: Philadelphia Flyers (2) vs. Buffalo Sabres (7)

My Prediction: Flyers win in 6 games.

Comments: The Flyers were a good team this year, and they’ll probably make it to the Finals again. Not saying they’re gonna win it all–they might be like the Boston Bruins were in the late 1980s, a team good enough to get there but not good enough to win it all.

Other than Ryan Miller, the Sabres do little to impress me.

Series: Boston Bruins (3) vs. Montreal Canadiens (6)

My Prediction: Bruins win in 6 games.

Comments: I might watch this series–not to see great goal scoring and awesome saves by Tim Thomas and Carey Price.

Nope. I might watch it to see if the Canadians–or more specifically, the Canadiens fans–do or say anything about the whole Zdeno Chara / Max Pacioretty incident. Will the “Death to Chara!” signs be written in English or French? Will there be a 7-foot tall Zdeno Chara pinata hanging from the rafters of the Bell Center?

Series: Pittsburgh Penguins (4) vs. Tampa Bay Lightning (5) 

My Prediction: Penguins win in 7.

Comments: The Penguins won’t get far without Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin. But they’ll make it at least to the next round.

—————————————-
Two years ago, I was 12 for 15 in my playoff predictions (80%).

Last year, I was 10 for 15–down to 66%. But that’s OK, because the ‘Hawks won the Cup.

How will I do this year? Hopefully, well enough to win Captain Canuck’s playoff contest.

And if you really like playoff-themed contests, there’s one on the blog Drop the Gloves, too.

Hockey Headlines for April 1, 2011

Here are today’s top headlines in the world of hockey:

Capitals, Penguins to play next 10 Winter Classics

Thursday, the NHL announced that the Winter Classic – the annual outdoor game held on New Year’s Day – would be played between the Pittsburgh Penguins and the Washington Capitals for the next 10 years.

“What a marvelous day for hockey, to show off our best teams and greatest players to television audiences everywhere,” said NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman, forgetting that water also freezes in other regions of the U.S. and in Canada. “Fans across the nation will be able to see Sidney Crosby and Alexander Ovechkin – two true stars of the game – go head to head in every Winter Classic until 2021.”

Bettman mentioned that other teams playing in the annual event are “not completely out of the question” should Crosby or Ovechkin be traded or retire.

Millions blinded by Don Cherry’s latest jacket

During Saturday’s Maple Leafs-Red Wings game, over 15 million Hockey Night in Canada viewers were temporarily blinded by Don Cherry’s latest garment – a luminescent, double-breasted polyester jacket that glowed with the power of 5 suns.

Emergency centers were jammed with calls from frantic hockey fans claiming they had gone blind. Fortunately, the effects were temporary. Viewers regained their sight later that evening, but also complained about severe headaches after hearing Pierre McGuire and Mike Milbury argue during the second intermission’s “Hot Stove” segment.

Upper Deck unveils new 2011-12 OPC cards

Two prototype cards from the forthcoming 2011-12 O-Pee-Chee set.

Today, Upper Deck gave collectors a first look at their upcoming set of 2011-12 O-Pee-Chee hockey cards. Hitting stores in late 2011, the cards feature enhanced photography, complete player statistics and an O-Pee-Chee logo that fills 90% of the card’s front.

“For decades, fans of all ages have loved the O-Pee-Chee brand of hockey cards,” said Upper Deck in a press release. “What better way to give collectors that feeling of nostalgia by making the O-Pee-Chee logo even larger than we have in the past. That way, fans can feel like they are collecting the cards of their youth, even though they are not.

In an effort to increase the desirability of the set, Upper Deck plans to ruin one card in every pack by staining it with wax.

Report: NBC analyst Roenick used to play hockey

This trading card (inset) might be proof of Roenick’s alleged NHL career.

Jeremy Roenick, a studio analyst for NBC since 2009, has made countless repeated claims of a professional hockey career – most recently during Saturday night’s San Jose Sharks – Phoenix Coyotes game. 

It’s true. I played in the National Hockey League for 20 years,” said the 41-year old several times during the broadcast.

“Shane Doan – I used to play with him when I was with Phoenix!” said an excited Roenick after seeing the Coyotes’ captain notch a goal against the Sharks. “And I scored my 500th goal with San Jose.”

Roenick also claims to have played with the Los Angeles Kings, Chicago Blackhawks and Philadelphia Flyers.

During both intermission reports, three rinkside interviews and the postgame show, Roenick mentioned his alleged NHL career 147 times, and talked about his membership in an organization called the “U.S. Hockey Hall of Fame.” As of press time, Roenick had no comment about the Coyotes-Sharks game he covered.

Avery puts flaming bag of poo in Brodeur’s crease

Avery (right) denies any wrongdoing in Wednesday night’s incident.

In a move that NHL officials are calling “unconventional,” New York Rangers winger Sean Avery left a burning paper bag filled with excrement in the goal crease of New Jersey Devils’ netminder Martin Brodeur.

“Brodeur is full of [bleep], so I thought the bag belonged to him,” said Avery after the game.

Notorious for agitating opponents, Avery set the bag in front of Brodeur during the second period, causing the goalie to smother the flames with his pads while Rangers center Chris Drury scored. However, the goal was immediately waived off by referee Don Van Massenhoven, as it is against the rules to distract the opposing goaltender with open flames or feces.

Neither Brodeur nor the New Jersey Devils have commented on the matter, but reportedly the Devils’ equipment manager has asked for a raise.

Thrashers acquire rest of ‘Hawks in latest trade

Click to see larger.

In a stunning blockbuster trade, the Atlanta Thrashers have acquired every member of the Chicago Blackhawks from 2010.

“We feel that this gives our team a legitimate chance to win the Stanley Cup,” said Thrashers’ GM Rick Dudley at a press conference earlier today. Jonathan Toews, Duncan Keith, Patrick Kane and Antti Niemi are just 4 of the 19 players acquired in the complex, 6-way trade that also included the Philadelphia Flyers, San Jose Sharks, Montreal Canadiens and Dallas Stars.

“We believe those guys will fit in well with [Andrew] Ladd and [Dustin] Byfuglien,” said Dudley of his team’s new acquisitions.

In exchange, the Thrashers gave up a package of prospects, future draft picks and Dudley’s first born child.

In other news…
Happy April Fools’ Day!

Happy St. Patrick’s Day

No, I don’t celebrate St. Patrick’s Day…but apparently, Don Cherry does. This picture of Don from the most recent episode of Coach’s Corner is just flat out ridiculous.

As the McDonald’s commercial says, “I’m lovin’ it!”

I don’t know how Don Cherry manages to outdo himself, but somehow he consistently does. That fact is almost as scary as the florescent green hat that he wore Saturday night.

Not too long ago, I found a blog that documents what Don Cherry wears each week. The blog is cleverly entitled Don We Now Our Gay Apparel. Sadly, they haven’t updated in 5 weeks (despite my girlfriend emailing their webmaster a copy of the above pic).

Also, I wanted to make a some sort of joke about how if Don Cherry had a cherry on his hat, he’d look like a Shamrock Shake. But it’s late, I’m sick and joke writing is not my forte at 11:45pm.

Plus, I realize that not everywhere in North America has Shamrock Shakes

Question: So now I ask you….does your local McDonalds sell Shamrock Shakes during the month of March?

Saturday Card Show – A Quick Recap

This Saturday, I went to the Sun-Times Sports Collectibles Show in Rosemont, IL. A few quick highlights and lowlights:

  • I traded cards–yes TRADED CARDS–with fellow collectors Tim (The Real DFG) and Nick. It was like being a kid again. I got cards I wanted and I got rid of cards that I didn’t want. Best of all, there was no haggling or price guides involved. Negotiations pretty much went like this:

    “Here are some cards you need.”
    “Thanks! Here are some cards you need.”

  • My 3 favorite hockey dealers were not at the show. A large, bearded fellow who calls himself “Big John” and deals mainly in newer hockey singles was notably absent, as was this older Canadian gentlemen who deals solely in high-quality, pre-1974 hockey cards. And my favorite hockey card-dealing couple, Diane and Paul Bogar of D & P Collectibles, were not at the show either. 
  • My friend Danny went with me. He’s not into sports cards, but he collects jerseys (the ones you wear, not jersey cards) and logo patches. Danny does well at finding jerseys for steals. It’s always more fun to go with a friend. 
  • I couldn’t find any great deals on vintage singles, but found plenty of dealers trying to get full book value for their cards. Sorry, but I can’t afford $200 for a Guy Lafleur rookie card…I don’t care how near-mint it is.And if I’m going to break the bank on one, I’m going to get it from the Canadian guy mentioned above 
    • I did pick up some mid-grade vintage singles from the 1960s. I’ll post pictures soon.
    • I bought a box of this year’s Artifacts. I know–that is so unlike me. I usually stick to the low-end, 500 card sets, but there’s a first time for everything. Hopefully, I’ll open them tonight while watching the Blackhawks-Shaaarks game.
      • Speaking of first times, I bought 4 boxes of In The Game hockey cards. I’ve never purchased any of their “not licensed by the NHL” stuff. Box breaks coming soon.  
      •  I purchased numerous autographed cards–for very little money. But I’ll post those on my other blog.  
        • The show ended at 5pm. Waaaaaah! I was there for 8 hours, and could have stayed another 2. But then I would have went home broke.  
        • Finally, I purchased a 1977-78 Topps Hockey Set for $66. It was in near-mint shape–sharp corners, great centering, perfect edges–but was missing #81 (Islanders checklist). 

          Despite my favorite vendors not being there–and the overall dearth of quality-yet-affordable hockey–I had a better time at this show than I usually do. I went with a friend to the show, met a friend there and made a new one. Plus, I didn’t spend all the money in my pocket.